They could never be conscious they get a hold of plans inside the relationship much more alluring than solitary purpose

Toward likelihood of making out to your address, discover a serious communications anywhere between grandiose narcissism and participant gender, ? = .161, t = 2.819, p = .005. Which interaction was displayed into the Fig 2. The easy hills for males (simple hill = 0.051., t = .007, p = .995) and girls (easy mountain = -0.011., t = -0.002, p = .999) weren’t significant. Grandiose narcissists did not express an elevated probability of kissing with an attached target more than just one (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating one grandiose narcissism wasn’t of the companion poaching getting a short-identity affair.

Grandiose narcissists have a tendency to declaration lover poaching -particularly for the fresh short-name . However, a question remains regarding whether they discover people in relationships alot more worthy of getting than simply folks who are solitary. Widman and you can McNulty reason that grandiose narcissistic inclinations will be triggered all over points on average (like the care about-declaration out of lifestyle incidence regarding intimate behavior), however be triggered when placed in a specific problem. For this reason, it will be possible you to grandiose narcissists disclose a track record of enjoyable in the companion poaching, but never always see those in dating become top mates. We looked at this options when you look at the five knowledge.

Mate poaching index.

For very long-name partner poaching, grandiose narcissism is actually a significant predictor for ladies (? = .306, t = 2.623, p = .010) and you can a marginally significant predictor for men (? = .218, t = 1.725, p = .088). Not one of your own Huge Four details were extreme. Grandiose narcissism wasn’t a critical predictor regarding achievements on poaching on a lot of time-label for males (? = .120, t = 0.718, p = .476), but it are for ladies (? = .340, t = 2.369, p = .021). None of additional factors was basically extreme with the exception of ladies neuroticism; when female had been much more neurotic, it stated more profits on poaching for a long-term intimate matchmaking.

Results

Of interest, grandiose narcissism wasn’t of the lover poaching one of guys. So it result is consistent with performance said of the Kardum and you will colleagues . Ergo, you’ll be able you to grandiose narcissistic ladies are with greater regularity accountable out-of mate poaching.

Materials and process

There was a significant three-way interaction between grandiose narcissism, participant relationship status, and participant sex for the likelihood of pursuing the target for a relationship (? = .162, t = 2.666, p = .008). This three-way interaction is displayed in Fig 1. Data are plotted at ±1 SD from the mean of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached men was significant (simple slope = .05, t = 9.24, p < .001), revealing that men in a relationship were more likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached women (simple slope = -.04, t = -3.27, p = .001) revealed that women in a relationship were less likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single men was also significant (simple slope = -.02, t = -2.38, p = .02), revealing that single men were less interested in pursuing the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single women was not significant (simple slope = .024, t = 1.56, p = .12). With the exception of the slope differences between single women and attached men (t = -1.65, p = .10), the differences in slopes were all significant (ts ? -2.16, ps ? .03). The grandiose narcissism ? target relationship status interaction was not significant (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not associated with mate poaching for a long-term affair.